What the map supports
Visual comparison of broad spatial patterns in the supplied 2015 and 2025 dissolved-oxygen observations.
ENVIRONMENTAL GIS · WATER QUALITY · SPATIAL INTERPOLATION
Supplied monitoring observations transformed into comparable spatial surfaces for environmental interpretation and communication.
01 / SPATIAL COMPARISON
Lower dissolved-oxygen estimates appear in warm colors and higher estimates in green across a shared 3–9 mg/L display range.

02 / ANALYTICAL WORK
The project separates data provenance from the analytical and cartographic work completed for the comparison.
Organize the provided dissolved-oxygen observations for consistent spatial processing and year-to-year comparison.
Transform discrete observations into estimated dissolved-oxygen surfaces covering the sampled portions of Chesapeake Bay.
Use a common geographic extent, measurement unit, and color scale so differences between 2015 and 2025 can be read consistently.
Combine the analytical surfaces with reference geography, labels, legend, scale, orientation, and source information.
03 / INTERPRETATION
Spatial interpolation estimates conditions between monitoring locations. It does not turn every mapped pixel into a direct field measurement.
Visual comparison of broad spatial patterns in the supplied 2015 and 2025 dissolved-oxygen observations.
Sampling location, water depth, season, temperature, salinity, and station density can influence dissolved-oxygen patterns and the interpolated result.
Two mapped periods alone do not demonstrate a causal environmental trend or conditions at every location in the Bay.
04 / PROJECT CONTEXT
This work demonstrates the ability to transform supplied environmental observations into a clear, analytically responsible spatial comparison.
Return to selected work